‘[T]heater
isn't a place to go to forget anything, but a place to go to remember.’ —David Mamet (quoted in Sanchez-Escalonilla,
2014).
On 24 July 2019 we attended the opening night of Forgotten at Riverside Theatres, a play
about the first riot of the women in the Parramatta Female Factory in 1827 by
playwright, Cate Whittaker.
A sizable cast of school students, alumni of the
Parramatta diocese Catholic schools’ performing arts program, CAPTIVATE,
provided a rabble amply raucous for the small Lennox Theatre stage.
The story focused on a few key women who were sent
to third class—where they did hard labour—and the rebellion that broke out after
the ongoing theft of the prisoners’ rations.
Women were brought to the colony for the purpose of
growing the population in Australia. Marriages were arranged out of Female
Factories for freed convicts and were a way out for the women, as was the
possibility of being employed as a domestic servant. The Parramatta Female
Factory—named thus, and impressed upon as just that, ‘a factory’, by the Matron in the play, because the women were put to productive
work—was the first in Australia.
(While I have still not been to visit the
Parramatta Female Factory, I was pleased to recall some of these details from
visiting the Cascades and Ross Female Factories in Tasmania three years ago.)
My recent reading on institutionalisation in the
nineteenth century gave me insight into the Irish experience in both Britain
and Australia. Those Irish frequently institutionalised in asylums and hospitals
in Australia had often been previously interned in British institutions. As a
subjugated population, the Irish were characterised in racialised ways as being
physically and mentally weak, diseased and degenerate—characterisations that
persist today with clichés of the Irish as drunk and disorderly. Migrating to
Australia, it seemed, was a new beginning of ongoing institutionalisation and racialised
treatment of the Irish.
This context, for me, made the moment toward the
end of the second act with an Aboriginal woman all the more poignant, as she
and veteran convict, Annie, commiserated over the loss of their respective
lands to the ‘bad white men’: the British.
And if this emotional moment just before the
intermission foreshadowed the emotion at the end of the play, that was made more
significant for me by the details of the costuming, colour symbolism of cloth
and ribbon reminiscent of the plays of the Irish Literary Revival. (Thanks to
my recent studies of Irish Literature.)
The focus on herstory,
the untold stories of women in history, was given significance by all of the
female characters being given first names, and the secondary stories of
experiences of diaspora, loss of family and children, and opportunities of
marriage and work outside the prison. Each of these stories was given poignancy,
from the gift of food from the Aboriginal woman, a solo song to a separated
child, the loss of a child, making the audience empathise with the convicts’ campaign
against deprivation.
While I would note that the Irish accents employed may
be forgiven, the subject of this play should certainly not be forgotten.
Reference
Sanchez-Escalonilla, A. (2013). Verisimilitude and
film story: the links between screenwriter, character and spectator. Communication & Society, 26(2),
79-94. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/docview/1468444821?accountid=10382
No comments:
Post a Comment